Sub-theme 02: (SWG) Organizational Trust across Contexts: Towards More Context-sensitive Research
Call for Papers
Trust has become a central topic in organizational research over the past two decades (see for example special issues
in Organization Studies, AMR, HRMJ, etc.). Yet, surprisingly little research has considered the context-boundedness of trust
and context-specific forms of trust (Kramer, 2007: 13). Much research tacitly assumes that trust is a universal concept and
can be developed along the same routes in any national socio-economic context. Although there are a number of sporadic contributions
on context-specific issues of trust (e.g. Child & Möllering, 2003; Hagen & Choe, 1998; Welter & Kautonen, 2005;
Yamagishi et al., 1998), there are only a few conceptual attempts that recognize differences in the meaning or form of trust
between different environments, and systematically examine the causes and consequences. For instance, stakeholders tend to
look for different trust cues when forming expectations about companies (Pirson & Malhotra, 2010). Some researchers argue
that value congruence is an important aspect of trust-based relations and that core values differ between groups (Bijlsma-Frankema
et al., 2006). It has been suggested that interaction-based forms of trust are more dominant in countries that follow the
model of 'liberal capitalism' while strongly regulated business systems ('coordinated capitalism') have a greater capacity
to build trust on the basis of institutional arrangements, i.e. institutional-based trust (Bachmann, 2001).
What
is missing is a comprehensive understanding of how various forms of trust can be developed successfully within and, specifically,
across contextual, institutional and cultural borders (Ferrin & Gillespie, 2010; Saunders et al., 2010; Zaheer & Zaheer,
2006). This blind spot in trust research may well be caused by a dominance of functionalist-objective research approaches
and the view that only universally invariant phenomena deserve to be studied. This sub-theme is aimed at the critical review
of these assumptions and the systematic exploration of context and trust. In addition, we also wish to re-iterate the pledge
of Bamberger (2008) to move from simply identifying the context within which a distinct phenomenon is analyzed to develop
theories that incorporate differences in the phenomenon across contexts – a call which is virulent for trust research.
We invite contributions that provide insight on the impact of context on the forms, meanings, dynamics and/or processes
of organizational and institutional trust. In line with our Standing Working Group (SWG) 02, the focus is on trust at the
organizational and institutional level, as well as the dynamic interplay of trust between levels. We encourage papers that
examine the influence of a range of contextual variables, including but not limited to: national and organizational culture,
legal frameworks, institutional forms, socio-economic factors, power and vulnerability, historical and temporal influences,
etc. This sub-theme aims to shed light on the causes and consequences of these differences and identify strategies for the
context-sensitive management of trust-based vertical and horizontal business relationships within and across borders.
Below are some indicative questions:
- What contextual factors influence the form and function of trust? How does trust differ in understudied contexts such as family businesses, the public sector, or highly turbulent economic, political, organizational, or societal environments?
- In which contexts do interaction-based forms of trust matter more than impersonal forms, and vice versa? Under which circumstances is trust predominately calculative?
- Does trust development always go in stages? If so, how might different contexts influence the order of these stages?
- To what extent and how are efforts to repair organizational trust influenced by the specific contexts in which relationships are embedded?
- How might trust affect the contexts in which it occurs? How can trust be institutionalized to the extent that it becomes part of the context?
- How do contextual factors currently prevalent in many organizations, such as downsizing, cost-cutting and future uncertainty, influence organizational trust?
References
Bachmann, Reinhard (2001): 'Trust, Power and Control in Trans-Organizational Relations.' Organization Studies, 22 (2), pp. 337–365.
Bamberger, Peter (2008): 'Beyond contextualization: Using context theories to narrow the micro-macro gap in management research.' Academy of Management Journal, 51 (5), pp. 839–846.
Bijlsma-Frankema, Katika, Sim Sitkin & Antoinette Weibel (2006): Distrust in the balance: Evolution and resolution of inter-group distrust between judges and administrators in a Court of Law. Paper presented at the EGOS Colloquium in Bergen, Norway.
Child, John & Guido Möllering (2003): 'Contextual confidence and active trust development in the Chinese business environment.' Organization Science, 14 (1), pp. 69–80.
Ferrin, Donald L. & Nicole Gillespie (2010): 'Trust differences across national-societal cultures: Much to do, or much ado about nothing?' In: Mark N. Saunders, Denise Skinner, Graham Dietz, Nicole Gillespie & Roy J. Lewicki (eds.): Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 42–86.
Hagen, James M. & Soonkyoo Choe (1998): 'Trust in Japanese interfirm relations: Institutional sanctions matter.' Academy of Management Review, 23 (3), pp. 589–600.
Kramer, Roderick M. (2007): Organizational Trust: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pirson, Michalel & Deepak K. Malhotra (2011): 'Foundations of Organizational Trust: What matters to different stakeholders?' Organization Science, 22 (4), pp. 1087–1104.
Saunders, Mark N., Denise Skinner, Graham Dietz, Nicole Gillespie & Roy J. Lewicki (eds.): Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welter, Friederike & Teemu Kautonen (2005): 'Trust, social networks and enterprise development: exploring evidence from East and West Germany.' The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1 (3), pp. 367–379.
Yamagishi, Toshio, Karen S. Cook & Motoki Watabe (1998): 'Uncertainty, trust, and commitment formation in the United States and Japan.' American Journal of Sociology, 104 (1), pp. 165–194.
Zaheer, Srilata & Akbar Zaheer (2006): 'Trust across borders.' Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (1), pp. 21–29.