Sub-theme 12: (SWG) The Temporal Experience of Organizing
Call for Papers
A process view of organizing suggests that coordinated actions are made possible by collective experiences that
evolve continuously through the creative re-construal of shared histories, and the simultaneous generation of alternative
futures. Actors are thrown into a world on the move (Heidegger, 1927), which they experience through projections from their
remembered pasts onto their anticipated futures. They find themselves in an on-going present, of which both past and future
are aspects. Past and future are not temporal epochs distinct from the present, but rather they take part in the making of
present experience.
The various ways in which time may be experienced in organizations lie at the heart of this
sub-theme. Michel Serres once said of time that it does not pass but percolates. If time is to 'pass' it would have
to penetrate a substance or a porous environment, it would have to be absorbed and filtered, it would have to be experienced.
For Whitehead (1920), time implied evanescence, while Bakhtin (1981) invoked the notion of chronotopes to signify the unity
of time and place. For the Pragmatists, temporal experience was inherently creative (Mead, 1932) as actors abductively imagine
what might become (Peirce, 1965), while Castoriadis (1997) emphasized the role of affect in the creative emergence of social
imaginaries. Varied and rich, these ideas and feelings about time belie the prevailing view of temporality as something that
can be measured out on clock faces, and managed as such.
This temporal view also invites a fresh approach to
spatiality as lively, open-ended, and in motion (Massey, 2005). We ask therefore, how the spatial and temporal interplay between
rememberings and imaginings work together to inflect organizational practices as diverse as change management, strategizing,
leadership, decision-making, learning, narrating, sensemaking, innovating, and the cognitive and emotional dynamics of managerial
talk. Further, we invite our colleagues to reflect on this interplay in their own practices as researchers.
We
welcome contributions on the philosophical nature of time (its shapes, its forms, its fleeting nature) and on the various
analytical conceptualizations of time and temporality in organizational research. Theoretical papers may take the form of
speculative inquiries stimulated by works in philosophy or sociology, while empirical papers may address a wide range of phenomena
beyond those of formal organization. We invite studies that probe lacunae and suggest remedies in organization studies, particularly
those that build on and critically challenge concepts such as "episodes", "events", "experiences" or "moments" as well as
ideas of interpretation, embodiment or enactment.
Potential topics for submissions might include (but are not
limited to):
- The nature of temporal experience in organizations
- Reflexivity and novelty in organizing processes
- Histories of organizations and organizing
- Leadership as imagining different pasts and futures
- Affect and the emotionality of temporal experience
- The dynamics of temporal agency
- Experiencing temporality through material objects
- Continuity and emergence as aspects of structure
- The interplay of temporality and spatiality
- Narratives and temporal experience
References
- Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981): The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.
- Castoriadis, Cornelius (1997): "The crisis of the identification process." Thesis Eleven, 49 (1), 85–98.
- Heidegger, Martin (1927): Being and Time. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
- Massey, Doreen (2005): For Space. London: SAGE Publications.
- Mead, George Herbert (1932): The Philosophy of the Present. LaSalle, Illinois: Open Court.
- Peirce, Charles Sanders (1965): Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Edited by C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Whitehead, Alfred North (1920): The Concept of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.