PDW 07 – Activist Scholarship via Creative Works: Workshopping the Possibilities [09:00-11:00]
Call for Applications
Facilitators
Nitha Palakshappa, Massey University, New Zealand
Ozan Nadir Alakavuklar,
Universiteit Utrecht, Netherlands
Purpose
This proposed professional development workshop (PDW) aims to support the development of activism and activist scholarship across the Organisational Studies community. The workshop, conducted in four sections, will focus specifically on the use of creative works, such as films, plays and art exhibitions, as a means of performing activist modes of research inquiry. The first, introductory section, presents and discusses the various types of critically orientated creative works recently produced and how each might be evaluated as pieces of activist scholarship. The second presents or performs identified examples of creative scholarly activist works in short form and invites participants to engage immersively, aesthetically, critically and collaboratively with each via group discussion. The third offers participants a set of tools for undertaking video/visual works. In the fourth section, participants will be invited to develop potential plans for making creative works part of their critically engaged teaching and scholarly inquiry. The final section will include short commentaries and feedback from the workshop contributors (see list below). One of the wider aims of the workshop is to help develop further a community of critical scholars undertaking creative works which will feature in future critical organisational studies workshops and symposia.
Relevance to EGOS
The proposed workshop is highly relevant to the general theme for EGOS 2026, “Reframing Organizations in More-than-Human Society”. It provides a forum for new and existing members of the division to discuss creative scholarly activist works that incorporate more-than-human techniques and technologies as a platform, method and means of developing activist interventions and scholarly activist research formats. In this sense, the proposed professional development workshop supports the EGOS theme of reframing existing models, methods and practices. The EGOS’s introduction to this year’s theme notes the importance of sharing and communicating scholarly knowledge with new audiences in formats that fit with the life worlds of those audiences. Particularly, the call highlights reframing by developing new narratives, new words, new grammars, and new vocabularies that amplify diverse voices speaking from unexplored methodological positions. Both the content and processes used in our workshop proposal seek to address these concerns.
Description of the Workshop
Organizational studies research
appears to be developing a stronger activist counter discourse. Perhaps spurred by the activism of feminist scholars or by
the sense that the current ‘publishing game’ is overly careerist and instrumental, this counter discourse recommends activist
forms of engagement and performativity (Leca et al., 2014; Spicer et al., 2009; Wickert & Schaefer, 2015; King, 2015).
While some of this work originates in the desire for research and teaching that contributes to alleviating ‘real’ world problems
(a desire at core of Critical Organisational Studies), it also derives from various theoretical tributaries that assume a
performative ontology (Barad, 2003; Gond et al., 2015). Put simply, such an approach regards research not as a practice of
attempting to represent the real world, but as a set of actions that perform that world in new ways. In this
proposed PDW we seek to present, investigate and discuss the role of creative works as a means undertaking and performing
activist scholarship and engaging with audiences in new ways.
Our proposed workshop aims to develop and extend
the appreciation of creative works, such as film, theatre or sculpture, as a means of undertaking critical scholarship. Along
with others (Hietanen & Rokka, 2018; Rokka & Hietanen, 2018; Wood & Brown, 2011; Wood et al., 2018), we argue
that the potential value of creative works as a mode and means of critical scholarship is currently undervalued and underdeveloped.
Of course, visual methods of representation such as images, photographs and graphics are commonplace scholarly artefacts.
However, scholar-produced video, for example, has yet to be fully developed as a means of undertaking scholarly and activist
scholarly work, despite the availability of the technology, its ease of use and its centrality to everyday storytelling.
That said, in recent years a small number of such works have appeared, most in the documentary vein, some of which have
garnered widespread recognition and awards. These examples include the mining disaster documentary Black Snow.
This multi-award-winning 2017 film, written and directed by Steve Linstead, forms part of a broader effort to remember and
critically engage with the nineteenth-century Oakes Colliery disaster in Yorkshire, England, which claimed the lives of more
than 350 miners, many of them under the age of fourteen. Alongside Black Snow, we draw on Martin Wood’s short film
600 Mills, which, inspired by Gilles Deleuze’s theorisation of space, examines the reconfiguration of Melbourne’s
garment industry. This work builds on Wood’s earlier documentary Lines of Flight, which explores rock climbing as
an extreme experiential practice set against the highly organised and disciplined character of contemporary work and everyday
life. In a similar vein, Of Labour and Love, a documentary film by one of the facilitators, offers a further example
of critical scholarship articulated through the video medium, foregrounding questions of labour, debt, and ethical engagement.
In addition to clips from these films, the PDW will include a short reading from a play by Taylor (2025), that critically
examines managerial control and organisational power through performative and narrative means, and from an article written
in part as a script for a play (Wilson et al., 2022) which imagines what various philosophers would say if they attended a
conventional leadership development course. We will also provide photos and video footage of a sculptural installation (Wilson
et al., 2025) produced as part of a research project which was inspired by the conceptualization of misogynist attacks on
women leaders as akin to a glass cage (Wilson & Julian, 2023), surrounding them with hostile surveillance and impeding
their agency. Together, these examples of activist scholarship via creative works will be used as provocations during the
workshop to stimulate collective reflection on such modes of inquiry and activism and to explore how such alternatives can
unsettle dominant textual and managerial modes of knowing in organisation studies.
Format
The workshop is structured as follows:Introduction and key questions:
We present and discuss the current state of scholarly
activist creative work, and present a set of questions and issues that could be used to critically evaluate critical-orientated
projects of this nature.
Illustrative examples:
This section involves the experience of engaging
with segments of the examples noted above, followed by a short critical review of these works by Professor Nitha
Palakshapa.
Group-based Critical Reviews:
Next, participants in small groups will discuss
their responses to the works observed and identify the questions that arise regarding the why and the how
of using creative works for activist scholarship, before reporting back to the whole group.
Tools for creating
video:
In this section the organizers will offer a set of tools for producing critically-orientated videos or
other visual works. They will discuss the theory that guides them, the practices they find useful, and some of the key structural
formulae and technical shortcuts to success.
Creative works Plans:
In
this section of the workshop, the contributors (working as group facilitators) will encourage the participants to offer
short summaries of their current scholarly and activist work and to develop and discuss draft plans of how (and to what extent)
creative works might be used to enhance and develop this work.
Contributor’s commentary:
The session will end with short verbal presentations from each of the contributors (group facilitators). They will reflect
on the critical questions raised at the beginning of the session, their response to these, discuss any plans they have to
use creative works in their own work. Furthermore, they will discuss some of the ideas and plans that participants from their
particular groups (with their permission) came up with that address the various challenges and issues the revolve around critical
scholarship that uses creative works.
Application
To be considered for this PDW, applicants should submit a single document (.docx or .pdf) via the EGOS website that includes:- A cover page with full details of name, affiliation, and email address.
- A brief motivational statement outlining why they would like to participate in the PDW, what they hope to gain from it, and one question they would like to pose to the panellists as part of the opening discussion.
References
- Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs, 28(3), 801–831.
- Bell, E., Warren, S., & Schroeder, J. E. (Eds.). (2014). The Routledge companion to visual organization. Routledge.
- Cabantous, L., Gond, J. P., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2016). Critical essay: Reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations, 69(2), 197-213.
- Davison, J., McLean, C., & Warren, S. (2015). Looking back: Ten years of visual qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 10(4), 355-359.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (Vol. 2). Sage.
- Gond, J. P., Cabantous, L., Harding, N., & Learmonth, M. (2015). What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12074
- Hietanen, J., & Rokka, J. (2018). Companion for the videography ‘Monstrous Organizing—The Dubstep Electronic Music Scene’. Organization, 25(3), 320-334.
- King, D. (2015). The possibilities and perils of critical performativity: Learning from four case studies. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(2), 255-265.
- Leca, B., Gond, J. P., & Cruz, L. B. (2014). Building ‘Critical Performativity Engines’ for deprived communities: The construction of popular cooperative incubators in Brazil. Organization, 21(5), 683-712.
- Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Crossroads tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6(5), 585-600.
- Rokka, J., & Hietanen, J. (2018). On positioning videography as a tool for theorizing. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 33(3), 106-121.
- Shortt, H. L., & Warren, S. K. (2017). Grounded Visual Pattern Analysis: Photographs in Organizational Field Studies. Organizational Research Methods, 22(2), 539-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117742495
- Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537-560.
- Taylor, S. S. (2025). Profile and creative work in organizational aesthetics and theatre. Organizational Aesthetics, 14(1), 9-26. https://oa.journals.publicknowledgeproject.org/index.php/oa/article/view/282/330
- Wickert, C., & Schaefer, S. M. (2015). Towards a progressive understanding of performativity in critical management studies. Human Relations, 68(1), 107-130.
- Wilson, S., Lee, H., Ford, J., & Harding, N. (2022). If philosophers went on a leadership course: A (serious) farce in three Acts. Leadership, 18(4), 471-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427150221083428
- Wilson, S., & Selman-Julian, D. (2025). Inside the glass cage: Online misogyny in Aotearoa New Zealand. https://www.ncwnz.org.nz/glass_cage_exhibition
- Wood, M., & Brown, S. (2011). Lines of flight: Everyday resistance along England’s backbone. Organization, 18(4), 517-539.
- Wood, M., Salovaara, P., & Marti, L. (2018). Manifesto for filmmaking as organisational research. Organization, 25(6), 825-835.

